Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 22, 2026

The Security State Spots Edwin Hoffman

After waiting over five years, I finally got the FBI files on Edwin D. Hoffman! Hoffman was one of the three professors at Allen University who were accused of being "communist workers" by South Carolina Governor George B. Timmerman  in the late 1950s.

The governor's accusations drew national attention and ultimately resulted in the dismissal of Hoffman and the other professors. However, the core of his claims is, at best, unclear under close inspection. The governor claimed that he'd seen records showing that Hoffman had been a member of various "Communist Party affiliates," but the groups he cites were obscure ones like the Queens County Financial Station. The name "Financial Station" certainly does not suggest troubling communist political activity. Moreover,  in most cases, Hoffman's involvement dated to a decade or more in the past. The FBI records shed light on the governor's claims and show how Hoffman first caught the attention of the surveillance state. 

The FBI files show Hoffman enthusiastically participated in left-wing political activities, essentially all of which the governor would have condemned. However, there is no evidence that he was a member of the Communist Parties, and his documented activities were well within constitutionally protected activities. 

Hoffman was first investigated by army counter-intelligence during the Second World War, and this occurred almost by accident. Shortly after Hoffman joined the army (on August 8, 1942), an army investigator was examining records at the City College of New York as part of an investigation unrelated to Hoffman. In the course of doing this, the investigator came across evidence that Hoffman had engaged in "communistic activities" while a student in the late 1930s.

The investigator's claim wasn't baseless, although it is striking that City College retained records on Hoffman several years after he graduated. When Hoffman attended the college, the student population drew heavily from the city's working-class immigrant families. Many had seen their families devastated by the Great Depression and were open to political and economic change. This manifested itself by a large wave of campus activism.

Hoffman was a leader among student activists. He helped form and then lead a chapter of the American Student Union. The governor of South Carolina described the ASU as a Communist Party affiliate, and he wasn't wrong. The ASU had been formed from various socialist and communist groups. However, the City College chapter focused on issues like opposing war and fascism. They successfully advocated for removing mandatory ROTC training. Hoffman's proudest achievements were those related to African-American rights. A student protest he participated in succeeded in getting the college to hire its first African-American instructor, Max Yergan. 

Hoffman's old student records were enough to trigger an army investigation. As Hoffman was enrolled in the army during war time, the military had extensive powers to investigate his activities. Investigators interviewed a number of the soldiers who worked with him as well as former employers, reviewed all the records they could get their hands on, and inspected his mail.

Investigators found a few additional causes for concern. Hoffman's political activities hadn't ended with college. When he registered as a voter, he had registered as a member of the American Labor Party. This was a legitimate, if minor, political party, but it promoted a socialist democratic platform and was viewed by some as communist-aligned. 

A more serious cause for concern were his Selective Service records. They showed that he told the draft board that he was a conscientious objector. Moreover, he had actively protested against the war. On May 29, 1941, Hoffman was stopped by a police officer for distributing "Communistic" anti-war pamphlets on a street corner. While the officer did not arrest him, he did make a report to Hoffman's draft board.

May 1941 was before both the invasion of the Soviet Union and the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and Hoffman's feelings about the war had evidently changed by the time he was inducted into the army. Every soldier interviewed spoke highly of Hoffman, although a few acknowledged that he held leftwing political beliefs. One officer said he was "pinkish" but loyal to the US. Two other officers said that Hoffman had discussed being an active communist during college and acknowledged that he had maintained friendships with active communists.

None of the soldiers expressed serious concerns about Hoffman, but investigators felt differently. They noted that he was friendly with another soldier (Richard J. Crohn) who had already been flagged as "proven to be a dangerous Communist." 

On January 22, 1944, army investigators completed their work and concluded that Hoffman was at least a communist sympathizer. He was deemed potentially subversive and a few months later (on March 17, 1944) he was restricted from sensitive duties.

Hoffman, it appears, was unaware of the investigators' findings or even the existence of an investigation. All evidence shows that he was a loyal soldier who dedicated himself to the war effort. He was commissioned as an officer and volunteered for combat duty at the time of the Normandy invasion. He served as an artillery forward observer in western Europe and earned three Battle Stars. 

Hoffman's military service did nothing to erase the army's concerns about his communist sympathies. A few years after the war (on March 26, 1948), the army provided the FBI with a copy of their records on Hoffman. Using those records as a basis, the FBI opened an investigation. The reasons for sending records to the FBI are unclear. In Hoffman's file, an FBI cover letter attached to Hoffman's military record is followed by four pages that are fully redacted under a national security exception. These pages may contain a description of why the files were transferred.

However they made their way to the FBI's files, the records were hugely consequential. The governor's accusations against Hoffman were a regurgitation of the army's findings together with some activities that the FBI had investigated in the early 1950s. 


Hoffman's Anti-War Pamphlet.

The text below is a transcription of the anti-war pamphlet that Hoffman was distributing in May 1941. The pamphlet is a response to one of President Roosevelt's radio addresses in which he encouraged Americans to support the war. At the time, America was nominally neutral, but it was sending supplies to the Allies via Naval convoys, something the pamphlet openly opposes. The pamphlet also opposed organizing an A.E.F., which was an acronym for an American Expeditionary Force (the term for the US military forces that fought in World War One). 

The pamphlet encourages readers to listen to an answer to the president's speech that Congressman Vito Marcantonio would deliver. The reference to Marcantonio is highly significant. He represented East Harlem and was one of the most left-wing members of Congress. At the time, he was a member of the American Labor Party. During the early years of the war, he was among the staunchest opponents to American military involvement. His position appears to have reflected his sympathy for communism. Up until June 1941 (a month after the pamphlet was distributed), the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany had formed a non-aggression pact, and  the Soviets encouraged American communists and their allies to advocate for American neutrality. 

 


Tuesday, December 29, 2020

What's in an FBI record?

Page from Wiggins' FBI file


Let's take a look at what an FBI record actually looks like. The image above is part of Forrest O. Wiggins' FBI file. What is in the document?

The upper-left corner tells us that this page is a FD-263 form. A FD-263 is a cover page for a full report. The top of the form tells us that this is a report produced by the Savannah office on information it generated. The information concerns Forrest O. Wiggins and is about a "Security Matter - C." In other words, it is about a security matter concerning communists.


The report was made on August 14, 1957, and it covers the following dates: March 14; April 10, 16, 17, 19, 24, 26; May 8, 15, 23; June 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 27; July 2, 3, 10, 26; August 5.

We can match these dates with dates from other sources to get some idea of what was attracting the FBI's interest. For example, the first date is March 14. Looking at earlier FBI records, we see that this was the day that the FBI received copies of an Allen University Bulletin containing an essay by Wiggins in which he promoted "Communist information." 

The June dates, especially the 16th and 17th, can also be explained. On the 15th, the President of Allen University asked Wiggins to resign his position. The June dates presumably reflect reports to the FBI on the back-and-forth between Wiggins and the president on resigning.

Another significant date is August 5. The next day was an Executive Board Meeting where the Allen trustees discussed dismissing Wiggins. Presumably, the FBI solicited information about what would happen at the meeting.

The dates that don't appear in other records are also interesting. For example, why are there so many April dates? I don't know, but this is something to look out for when reading other parts of the record.

The upper-right corner contains a crossed out stamp that reads "confidential." This means that the document was originally classified as confidential, but the document as currently released contains no confidential information.
The PDF that I have does not contain all the original text. Three parts of the text are redacted. The federal government is allowed to redact text under some specific exceptions. The exceptions being used are cited next to the text. Sometimes the nature of the exception shreds light as to what the missing information is.

First redacted text

The first redacted text is in a box labeled "Report made by." Presumably this is the name of the FBI agent who wrote the report. His name is being withheld under exception b7c. This exceptions allows withholding of an investigatory record that was compiled for law enforcement purposes when disclosing it would constitute an unwarranted invasion of someone's personal privacy. The standard for what  constitutes an unwarranted invasion of privacy is low since courts have ruled that just having your name in a legal report could damaging. Presumably, standard practice is to redact FBI agents names under this exception. The next exception is more interesting.

Second redacted text

This second text is also withheld under b7c. However, the nature of this text is less clear than the first. It appears that this is a sentence describing what Wiggins ("Subject") was doing.  Furthermore, the reasons for withholding this aren't pro forma: the whole paragraph is describing Wiggins' activities but nothing else is redacted. I have no idea what is discussed here, but it certainly is intriguing.


Third redacted text

The third redacted text appears to be the name, or another identifier, of a confidential informant for the FBI. This text is withheld under exceptions b2 and b7d. These are presumably the standard exceptions that are cited when withholding an informant's identity. Exception b2 allows withholding of records "related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency," while Exception b7d allows withholding of "information compiled for law enforcement purposes [which] could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source." 


Lower-left corner

From the lower-left corner of the document, we learn who got copies of the form. The form was produced by the Savannah office, and they made 3 copies which went into file 100-4211. The main office in DC received 4 copies by registered mail ("RM") that were stored in file 64-25362.

The history of this record is documented by stamps at the bottom.
Stamps on the bottom of the page

Two stamps are "Confidential" and "Subv. Control." Both have been crossed out. We've already discussed the "Confidential" stamp. I'm guessing the second stamp indicated that this file had to do with the surveillance of "subversives" (in this case, somebody who promotes "communist" ideas).

Slightly more significant is the stamp that reads "Copies Destroyed Nov 16 1961." I'm guessing that copies were destroyed as a matter of routine housecleaning. By 1961, there wasn't much interest in the records (Wiggins had left South Carolina) and keeping 7 copies of these records would have taken up a lot of space (this was pre-computers!).

Another stamp seems to read "63 Aug 26 1957 classified by." I don't know what the "63" stands for, but the August date falls a little over a week after the form was filled out. I'm guessing this indicates when the report was filled away.

There are a few notations on the document that I don't know how to interpret. For example, there is a handwritten remark directly above the (redacted) name an informant. The remark was written on August 27, 1957 which is the day after the form was classified. However, I can't make out what the rest of the text says. Let me know if you have any idea!
Handwritten remark.
Let me know if you can read it.



A Communist Cell in South Carolina?

Front page headline from the January 17, 1958 issue of The Columbia Record "Carolinas Have 147 Known Reds" screamed the headline o...